AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Chicago police department general orders9/18/2023 ![]() ![]() The battle over the gang database follows another perceived slight to the commission, where a report they drafted in early November that was critical of the proposed police budget went largely ignored. “And on the other hand, how much authority do we have, as a body that is meant and designed to provide holistic, comprehensive, hyperlocal, community-level input into these practices?” “They are on one hand saying we want public comments,” Nellis said. ![]() ![]() Nellis also said it is counterintuitive of CPD to seek public input by posting the policy online for comment while disregarding the input of the commission. The office also did not address concerns the department is working around the new commission.Ĭommissioner and defense attorney Cliff Nellis said he wasn’t satisfied by CPD’s response. WBEZ sought clarification from the Police Department’s press office, but a spokesman did not answer questions about why the gang database was drafted as a special order. That was a clean delineation that we were stopping the use of this older system.” “That is why it was designated a special order. “There was a lot of distinction between a lot of those drafts that we were revising, reforming and trying to get to the right place,” Kapustianyk said. Brian Kapustianyk struggled to explain to commissioners CPD’s motivation for the change. Then, in November of 2021, it was reclassified as a “Special Order.”ĭriver questioned the timing of this reclassification as the commission had been established by Chicago’s City Council just four months earlier in July of 2021. But despite repeated attempts, Driver couldn’t get an answer as to why CPD drafted the policy as a “Special Order,” which, unlike a “General Order,” falls outside the authority of the commission.Īccording to Robert Owens, with Chicago’s Office of Inspector General, early drafts of the gang data policy were created as general orders in 2020. 28, where commission members grilled several CPD personnel on how the new database would differ from the old version. “At that point, we made the decision that if they’re not going to take a meeting with us, we’re going to have a hearing about this and compel them to come before the commission.” 7 and the database would go into effect shortly afterward. Then, in early November, CPD notified the commission a draft of the policy would be made public until Dec. And for the next three weeks, the commission repeatedly sought a meeting with CPD to discuss concerns over the policy without success. When the commission held its first meeting, Driver said vetting the newly proposed gang database was a top priority.Ī week later, he said, the police department abruptly informed commissioners the policy would be implemented by the end of October, and that the commission would be briefed on it only a few days in advance.ĭriver said he immediately asked the department to put the policy on hold.Ī briefing with police officials was held, at which Driver said the vast majority of the commission’s questions went unanswered. Though CPD said it needs to collect the information to investigate crimes, previous iterations of gang data were riddled with errors and disproportionately targeted people of color, according to a report by the city’s top watchdog. The Chicago Police Department’s tracking of individuals allegedly affiliated with gangs has come under fire in recent years. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |